I saw two blog articles today with ideas that surprised me.
The first is pointed out here:
Pentagram’s Vishal Dadlani exultantly tweeted that the band had a rocking concert in Guwahati and Egypt became “free” on the same night! Then he wrote, “All it took was 18 days, and that the Egyptian people stood up for their rights. Come on India, you can do it!!”
The second one is here:
Even as Indian observers debate the question of why and how Egyptian revolution cannot be replicated in India, the unique characteristics of Egyptian revolution will be of interest to the readers here.
Of course we Indians are interested in what happens in Egypt, some in a general world-news way, some more intellectually. But these two people (i.e. Vishal Dadlani and V. Venkatesan) are talking about the feasibility of replicating Egypt’s revolution in India.
How did that idea even enter the mindspace of the Indian public?
Presumably because India has a lot of problems. A revolution might be an improvement in a country (like Egypt) that has been dictator-controlled for 30 years. But in a naturally feudal country with an active democracy (like India) that is seeing steady improvements, a revolution is like a roll of a pair of dice — with things getting better if both dice show 6. Most likely an Indian revolution will lead to a messy neo-feudal society with various warring factions tearing the country apart.
Are these commentators insane? They have a personal desire for a little excitement, and their way of getting their fix is to encourage revolutions in democracies.